solo & indie
You want to launch, not plumb
Real sign-in, billing and permissions in week one instead of week six, and without lying awake wondering whether you got them right.
Private beta · a few teams at a time
Request access
The risky half of your app, built and proven for you.
sign-in · permissions · payments · data · servers
For founders and small teams who can't afford to get accounts, permissions or payments wrong, and who'd rather own the result than rent it. We build those parts from a short description, prove them by attacking the running app, and hand you the code to keep.
Access is by request while the beta is private, opening more widely later. It's free to start, and anything paid is quoted before it's charged.
why this exists 01 / 08
AI made writing code cheap. It didn't make it safe.
Almost every engineering team now has AI writing code for them. Fewer than a third have full governance over what it produces, which leaves the rest carrying, in whole or in part, the mistakes that cost customers, contracts and weekends.
~10%
Of a leading coding agent's solutions were both working and safe
200 real tasks · the SusVibes benchmark
97%
Of enterprise engineering teams already build with AI
831 engineers · companies of 500+
30%
Of those same teams have full governance over what it writes
the other 70% have partial cover, or none
Fig. 01 what 200 real tasks produced SusVibes · SWE-Agent, Claude 4 Sonnet
- Tasks attempted 200
- Code that worked 122 61%
- Worked and was safe 21 10.5%
The hundred and one in between are the problem. Code that runs, ships, passes review and does the job, and is not safe. Nobody catches it, because working software looks exactly like working software. Every figure on this page is third-party research published between December 2025 and June 2026, not our own testing: the SusVibes benchmark (December 2025) and the Black Duck / UserEvidence enterprise study (June 2026).
Fig. 02 two of the hundred and one
From above, these are the same build.
Both of them run. Both of them pass a review, because a review reads the face, and the faces are identical, down to the last line. The one on the right has nothing underneath it. That is what the hundred and one in the middle of the chart are: software that works, and is not safe, and gives you no way to tell which one you have without going and looking.
how it works 02 / 08
You describe it. We build the part that has to be right.
Three steps, and only the first one is yours. No new language to learn and nothing to install before you can see it work.
step one · yours
Describe the app
Say what it is, who uses it, and what each kind of person is allowed to see. Plain sentences in one short file: the whole thing fits on a page.
step two · ours
We build the foundation
The whole foundation, built out in full and wired together, with every piece listed in the next section. The same way, every single time.
step three · ours
We try to break in
It starts the app for real and attacks it: signing in as the wrong person, asking for someone else's data. You get a one-page report of what it tried.
Fig. 03 one pass, end to end
The same three steps, every time.
You write the description. We lay the foundation from it. The faint copies are the builds before, landing in the same place every time, and then we attack the running app and seal the result. Nothing in the middle is a judgement call, which is why it comes out the same on Tuesday as it did on Monday.
Then it hands you the code.
What you get runs with no account of ours behind it, and nothing to depend on.
It's yours.
what we build 03 / 08
We take the part nobody wants to build twice.
The foundation is nearly the same in every serious app, and getting it wrong is expensive. Your product isn't the same as anyone else's, so we don't touch it.
we build it
The foundation
Rebuilt from your description every time, and never edited by hand.
So it can't quietly drift into something nobody understands.
you build it
Your product
We never write in your part of the project.
Rebuild as often as you like. Your work stays exactly where it was.
Fig. 04 what a rebuild touches
One side moves. The other never does.
The left stack is re-laid from your description on every single build. The faint copies under it are the builds before, landing in exactly the same place. The right stack is your code, and nothing we do reaches across that line. That is why rebuilding is safe to do as often as you like.
how it compares 04 / 08
Everyone can generate code now. Almost nobody can prove it.
The difference isn't speed: the AI tools are fast and they're good. The difference is whether anyone can tell you what you actually got.
Ask twice for the same thing
Generating code with AI Two different apps. Neither one is the app you reviewed last month.
With Oceantic The same app, exactly, and one command tells you so.
Is it secure?
Generating code with AI It says so. Nobody ran anything to find out.
With Oceantic It signs in as the wrong person, asks for your customer's data, and shows you it was refused.
The tests that come with it
Generating code with AI Written by whatever wrote the code, and they pass. That isn't the same as working.
With Oceantic We break your rules on purpose, to check the tests actually notice.
What you have to check
Generating code with AI Thousands of lines you didn't write and can't hold in your head.
With Oceantic One page describing your app in plain sentences.
Where your rules live
Generating code with AI Scattered through the code, in places nobody can list.
With Oceantic One line you can read, and we build exactly what it says, including if you got it wrong.
Your own work
Generating code with AI Ask again and it can be rewritten underneath you.
With Oceantic Untouched. There's a line down the middle, and we stay on our side of it.
When something's wrong
Generating code with AI Ask again, differently, and hope.
With Oceantic Change one line of the description and rebuild. Everything downstream follows.
If the company disappears
Generating code with AI Depends entirely on the platform you built on.
With Oceantic You already have the code and everything needed to rebuild it. Taking it out was never a paid feature.
Fig. 05 one description, four asks
Four asks. Only one of these lands in the same place twice.
On the left, every build is a new app, near enough to the last one to look right, different enough that the review you did last month was of something else. On the right, four builds and one fingerprint. Every other row in the table above is downstream of that one difference.
We're not competing with the tools that turn a prompt into a working screen. Use one, they're good at that. Oceantic is the layer underneath: the part those tools are worst at, and the part that hurts most when it's wrong.
proof 05 / 08
Don't take our word for it. Press the button.
Ask an AI tool for the same app twice and you get two different apps. Ask Oceantic twice and you get the same one, down to the last character.
The same description, built again
A fingerprint is a short code for exactly what was built. If it changes when you didn't change anything, then whatever you signed off last month isn't what's running today, and every check you did was on a different app.
run 01
An AI code generatorfirst run
Oceanticfirst run
This one is a demonstration, not a live build. The real thing is a file in your project that you can check yourself: build twice, compare the two.
who it's for 06 / 08
Built for whoever has to live with the consequences.
Same foundation for all of them. What changes is which part of it you were dreading.
small teams
Your first big customer asks hard questions
Answer the part everyone stumbles on with a report of what was actually tested, instead of a promise that someone was careful. No security hire required.
agencies & studios
Every client gets your best project
Hand over a codebase the client owns outright, built to the same standard on project ten as on project one, with the report attached.
larger companies
Somebody has to sign it off
A written record of what was built and what was tested, on the day it was built. Runs on your own infrastructure, with nothing calling home.
what you get 07 / 08
A working app, and the receipt to go with it.
Everything lands as ordinary files on your own machine. There is no piece of Oceantic left inside your live app, and it never calls us.
lands on your machine yours to keep
The app itselfcode
Your database and every safe change to itcode
The tests that were run against itcode
Everything needed to put it onlinecode
A ready-to-run package for your serversbuild
no Oceantic inside it·it never calls us
the report one build, as an example
Sign-in, passwords and staying signed intested
Nobody can see another customer's datatested
The app starts and answers, for realtested
Known security holes in anything we usednone new
Identical to the previous buildyes
every check named·every result recorded
where it runs your choice, not ours
your app
AWS
Google
Azure
your servers
no internet
anything that needs Oceantic to keep running nothing
That missing line is the whole trade. We'd rather hand you something you own than something you have to keep renting from us.
Fig. 06 the handover
It leaves, and nothing comes back.
Your app goes wherever you want it: one of the big clouds, your own servers, a machine with no internet at all. The line back to us is the one thing this drawing does not have. Taking your app out was never a paid feature, and it never will be.
still early
We're early, and moving quickly. What the teams in the beta ask for is what gets built next, so if your app needs something you haven't seen here, put it in the form. There's a fair chance it is already on the way.
the trade
Build the part that's yours.
Let us build the rest.
Bring something you actually want built, run it through, and check every claim on this page for yourself.
we build it · we prove it
Sign-in, permissions, data, payments, servers.
you build it · you own it
Your features, your design, your idea.
request access 08 / 08
Tell us what you'd build. Then go and build it.
We're letting teams in a few at a time. This isn't a waitlist that goes nowhere. You describe something you actually need, build it, and tell us where it falls short. Starting is free; if you want more later, paid packages are quoted in writing before anything is charged.
Who we're looking for right now
People building something where getting accounts and permissions wrong would be expensive, and who'd rather own what they end up with than rent it.
Worth knowing: the build arrives as a working app, screens included, and you run it on your own infrastructure, or bring your own frontend against the SDK. What isn't us, and isn't going to be: bespoke interface design, and somewhere hosted to deploy it.
request sent
That's with a founder.
Someone who can actually answer it reads it, not a queue, not a sales team. We reply to every one, and we'd rather not name a number we haven't earned the right to promise yet.
- Accepted
- beta terms & privacy notice
- On
- ·
- Reply to
- ·
A copy of what you agreed to is in the message itself, so you hold the same record we do. Nothing else was stored. What we store is still the whole of it.